ResearchFit
Sign inSign up
psychologyAll research gaps

Emotion and Affective Neuroscience

How emotions are generated and regulated, spanning amygdala-prefrontal circuits and clinical applications.

Find matching programs

The research landscape

PubMed records indexed
164,246
Published in last 5 years
76,691
Active NIH grants
73
NIH funding
$60M

Publication volume by year

  • 2999921
  • 2871022
  • 2884623
  • 2935324
  • 3099125
  • 1634726

Under-studied questions

Derived from the indexed PubMed literature and NIH funding record for this topic. Verify each cited paper before relying on a gap in an application.

  • Reliance on cross-sectional designs in emotion and affective neuroscience research

    Tentative

    Across the 28 most recent NIH-indexed emotion and affective neuroscience articles analyzed, 2 (7%) explicitly surface this issue in their own title or abstract. A recurring, self-reported constraint at this rate is a concrete opening rather than a general complaint.

    Evidence

    Detected in 2 of 28 abstracts (7%) by matching the language authors themselves use to describe study limitations. Counts come from cached PubMed records, not from an interpretation of them.

    Possible dissertation angle

    Design a longitudinal follow-up that measures the same constructs at multiple timepoints so temporal ordering can actually be established.

    Sources (2)

    Derived from 28 PubMed records and 73 active NIH grants.

  • High publication volume relative to active NIH funding

    Moderately supported

    Emotion and Affective Neuroscience shows roughly 2250 recent PubMed records for every active NIH project matched in RePORTER. Areas that publish heavily on comparatively few funded projects often rely on secondary analyses and small studies, which leaves room for primary data collection.

    Evidence

    164,246 PubMed records over the last six years against 73 active NIH projects totalling $60,276,123. Both figures are pulled live from NIH sources.

    Possible dissertation angle

    Propose a primary data-collection study rather than another secondary analysis, and target a funding mechanism (such as an F31) that rewards new data in an area where funded projects are scarce.

    Sources (4)

    Derived from 28 PubMed records and 73 active NIH grants.

Florida faculty working on this

Recent literature

See all on PubMed